Sunday, May 8, 2011

pinata


The Pinata post below was a great post. While i was reading it, it reminded me of a article i read awhile back, and it made me kind of sad. the article was about the "act of violence"in breaking the pinata. There was a town in the U.S. that has decided to outlaw the old style of pinatas which you must hit with a stick to break. it was said that that teaches a negative lesson to the kids involved in the activity. So, in response to this, a new type of pinata has been created that eliminates the act of violence. It has a pull string that when pulled, open the pinata. I do not understand this. I do not agree with this, especially now after I read the post below and learned the real history and meaning behind the pinata.

14 comments:

  1. Wow, a pull string. Really? Sounds like a pretty boring time. The first person to go would be the one pulling the string right away.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i know. that's the problem. a "non violent" pinata just totally defeats the purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I knew that they had pull pinatas, but the ones I knew of where for little kids. One of my friends had one for her daughter's first birthday, and the way it worked was that not all the strings made the candy fall out. So the little kids took turns pulling until the right one was pulled. I thought it made sense for toddlers. However, I cannot believe that the pinata was outlawed because of the "violence". Makes me wonder if they had other motives since the history clearly shows that a pinata is a positive thing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have seen one of these before at my family parties for my little cousins. Everyone pulls a string and there is only one that releases all the candy. When I was younger we always had the pinatas that you hit, I have never associated that with violence. I turned out fine after all these years with the old fashion pinatas :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. What's the fun of getting a pinata if you can't hit. It's no fun if the candy comes out with the pull of a string, who's dumb idea was that? I agree with Aaron.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Who would want to hit winnie the pooh in the face?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've heard of the "pull string" pinatas, they don't sound nearly as fun as the traditional sort. They might make sense if you wanted a pinata but had limited space for swinging the stick around, though.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wow that is just ridiculous that old-fashioned Pinatas have been outlawed due to the influence of violent behavior. It just makes me wonder what will they think of next?!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Somehow I don't think pinata will lead to violent behavior any more than pinning the tail on the donkey will lead to stabbing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. hahaha nicely said Tony.
    A whinny the pooh pinata:chidren's violence.... what do pinatas have to do with graphic design?!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hitting a pinata is not meant to be vicious, its sole purpose for kid's at least is to get the candy out. Pull strings defeat this whole purpose and take away from putting the effort in prior to getting a ground full of candy.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm pretty sure that if Pinatas stopped being shaped like cute animals and characters that this wouldn't have been a problem. The other Pinata post that told of the history and significance was very informative and if pinatas were still treated with the historical significance they once were then we probably wouldn't think of them as so 'violent' because you're hitting an abstracted object not some character's face.

    ReplyDelete
  13. In terms of design...I really like Winnie the Pooh illustrations?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I wonder what the non-violent alternative to pin the tail on the donkey is.

    ReplyDelete